According to Bourdieu, cultural practices and preferences, such as visiting museums, attending concerts, or reading certain types of literature, are closely tied to a person's educational level and social origin. Bourdieu found that individuals from higher social classes tend to have a greater familiarity and appreciation for highbrow or "legitimate" culture, while those from lower social classes may have a preference for popular or "mass" culture.
Bourdieu argues that the acquisition of cultural capital, which includes knowledge, skills, and cultural competencies, plays a crucial role in shaping an individual's taste. Cultural capital is acquired through upbringing, education, and exposure to cultural practices within the family and educational system. The cultural capital acquired in one's early socialization has a lasting influence on how cultural objects and practices are perceived and valued.
The distinction between different forms of culture, such as high culture and popular culture, also reflects social hierarchies. Bourdieu argues that there is a socially recognized hierarchy of the arts and within each art form, and the consumers of cultural goods are positioned in a corresponding social hierarchy. Taste, therefore, becomes a marker of social class and can be used to distinguish and identify different social groups.
Bourdieu also discusses the concept of the "pure gaze," which is associated with the aesthetic disposition or the ability to appreciate the formal qualities of artistic objects. The pure gaze requires a cultural competence and familiarity with the history and codes of a specific artistic tradition. This mode of artistic perception is associated with autonomy and detachment from the practical functions of art, as well as a suspension of everyday involvement with the world.
In contrast, Bourdieu notes that working-class individuals may have a different approach to culture and art, seeking more direct engagement and emotional resonance in artistic representations. Their judgments of art often have ethical or moral bases, and they may apply the principles of a "popular aesthetic" that values function and representation over form.
Overall, Bourdieu's work emphasizes the role of social class and cultural capital in shaping taste and cultural preferences. He argues that taste is not solely a matter of individual preference but is deeply intertwined with social structures and power dynamics.
Explanation
Pierre Bourdieu's work on distinction and the aristocracy of culture examines how people's tastes in cultural goods, such as art, music, and literature, are shaped by their upbringing, education, and social background. He argues that cultural preferences are not purely natural or innate but are influenced by external factors.
According to Bourdieu, cultural practices and preferences are closely linked to a person's educational level and social origin. Studies have shown that activities like visiting museums, attending concerts, and reading are more common among individuals with higher levels of education. Additionally, the influence of social background is strongest in less mainstream or avant-garde cultural practices.
Bourdieu suggests that there is a social hierarchy of consumers in relation to different art forms, genres, schools, or periods. This means that people's tastes can serve as markers of their social class. The manner in which culture is acquired also plays a role in how it is used. The importance placed on manners and etiquette can be understood as distinguishing different modes of culture acquisition and the classes of individuals associated with them.
Education plays a significant role in defining cultural nobility and determining the legitimate way of approaching culture and works of art. The educational system awards titles of nobility and measures pedigrees based on seniority in acquiring cultural knowledge. However, even within the educational system, there is a preference for early access to legitimate culture outside of formal academic disciplines. Direct experience and simple enjoyment are often valued over scholarly knowledge and interpretation, which can be seen as overly academic or pedantic.
In simpler terms, Bourdieu's work shows that our tastes in culture are not purely personal choices but are influenced by our upbringing, education, and social background. The cultural activities we engage in and the art forms we appreciate often reflect our social status. Education plays a significant role in defining what is considered high culture, but even within education, there is a preference for direct experience and enjoyment over scholarly analysis.
In this passage, Pierre Bourdieu discusses the process of perceiving and appreciating works of art. He argues that understanding and enjoying art require a specific cultural competence or knowledge, which he refers to as a "code" or "cultural code."
Bourdieu explains that perceiving art is like deciphering a code or cipher. The ability to see and understand the meaning and interest of a work of art depends on possessing the cultural competence or code into which it is encoded. This cultural competence includes the knowledge, concepts, and vocabulary needed to recognize and appreciate the styles and characteristics of a particular period, school, or artist. Without this specific code, a viewer may feel lost and unable to make sense of the sounds, colors, lines, and rhythms in the artwork.
Bourdieu argues that encountering a work of art is not simply a matter of love at first sight or immediate emotional response. Instead, it involves a cognitive operation of decoding and understanding, which requires the implementation of cultural knowledge and codes. The act of empathy or aesthetic pleasure for art lovers presupposes this cognitive process.
Bourdieu acknowledges that his intellectualist theory of artistic perception contradicts the experience of art lovers who acquire cultural competence through familiarization within their family circles. These individuals tend to have an enchanted experience of culture, where the process of acquisition is forgotten or less conscious.
He further suggests that the mode of artistic perception, which values the aesthetic disposition and the ability to appreciate form over function, is a historical invention. It emerged with the development of an autonomous field of artistic production, where art imposes its own norms on both the creation and consumption of its products. This emphasis on form and the "pure gaze" is demanded particularly by art movements like Post-Impressionism, which prioritize the mode of representation over the object being represented.
In simpler terms, Bourdieu explains that appreciating art requires a cultural competence or knowledge that acts as a code for understanding its meaning and style. Without this code, viewers may struggle to comprehend and enjoy artworks. He also recognizes that some people acquire this cultural competence unconsciously through their upbringing. The mode of perceiving art as a pure form and prioritizing aesthetics emerged historically and is influenced by the norms and values of the art world.
In this passage, Pierre Bourdieu discusses the autonomy of artists and the role of the audience in perceiving and interpreting artworks. He argues that artists aim for autonomy, seeking to be the masters of their creative output. They reject external programs imposed by scholars or interpreters and assert their control over the form, manner, and style of their work.
Bourdieu explains that artists produce what he calls "open works," which are deliberately polysemic, meaning they have multiple meanings and interpretations. This approach represents the artistic conquest of autonomy, particularly by poets and painters who historically relied on writers for interpretation and illustration. By prioritizing form and style over subject matter or external references, artists assert their independence and refuse to be bound by external necessities or functions.
Furthermore, Bourdieu highlights the shift from an art that imitates nature to an art that imitates art itself. Artists draw inspiration and experimentation from their own artistic traditions and history, rather than solely imitating the external reality. As artistic production increasingly refers to its own history, it demands to be perceived historically and connected to the universe of past and present works of art.
Bourdieu emphasizes that aesthetic perception is inherently historical because it operates within a field of artistic production. Just as naive painters who operate outside the artistic field remain disconnected from the history of art, naive spectators lack a specific understanding of artworks that derive meaning and value from their specific artistic traditions. The aesthetic disposition required to appreciate highly autonomous artistic works relies on a specific cultural competence that includes a grasp of the historical context and the ability to identify distinctive features of styles.
He suggests that this cultural competence is often acquired implicitly through exposure to artworks, similar to recognizing familiar faces without explicit rules or criteria. It remains mostly at a practical level and enables the identification of styles without needing to explicitly articulate their defining features. Even among professional art evaluators, the criteria used to judge and define stylistic properties often remain implicit.
In simpler terms, Bourdieu explains that artists aim to be independent and in control of their creative output. They prioritize form and style over external influences and reject imposed interpretations. Artists create open works that can have multiple meanings. Aesthetic perception of art is historical and relies on a specific cultural competence that includes understanding the historical context and identifying distinctive styles. This competence is often acquired through exposure to art and allows for the recognition of styles without explicit rules. Even professional art evaluators often rely on implicit criteria when judging artworks.
In this passage, Pierre Bourdieu explores the concept of the "pure gaze" and its implications for aesthetic perception. The pure gaze refers to a particular way of looking at art that involves a break with the ordinary attitude towards the world and entails social separation. According to Ortega y Gasset, modern art systematically rejects what is considered "human" or common, such as the passions, emotions, and feelings that ordinary people invest in their everyday lives.
Bourdieu argues that popular aesthetics, which emphasizes the continuity between art and life, subordinates form to function. This is evident in forms of popular entertainment like novels and theater, where working-class audiences tend to resist formal experimentation and prefer conventions that allow them to fully engage and identify with the characters. In contrast, aesthetic theory emphasizes detachment and disinterestedness as the way to recognize art's autonomous nature.
Popular judgments of paintings or photographs, according to Bourdieu, are rooted in an ethos that opposes the Kantian aesthetic. Working-class individuals expect images to have explicit functions, even if it's just serving as a sign, and their judgments often refer to moral or agreeableness norms. Their appreciation of art is always ethically based, whether they reject or praise it.
Bourdieu argues that popular taste reduces legitimate works of art to the realm of everyday life by applying the norms of ordinary circumstances to them. On the other hand, the seriousness or naivety with which popular taste engages with fictions and representations reveals that pure taste suspends naive involvement, which is one aspect of a quasi-playful relationship with the necessities of the world. Intellectuals, in contrast, tend to believe in the representation itself (literature, theater, painting) more than in the things represented, while the general public expects representations and their conventions to allow them to naively believe in the things represented.
The pure aesthetic, according to Bourdieu, is rooted in an ethos of elective distance from the necessities of the natural and social world. This may manifest as moral agnosticism, where ethical transgression becomes an artistic stance, or as aestheticism, which presents the aesthetic disposition as a universally valid principle and pushes the denial of the social world to its extreme. The detachment of the pure gaze is closely connected to a general disposition towards the world that arises from conditioning by negative economic necessities, leading to a life of ease and an active distancing from necessity.
In simpler terms, Bourdieu suggests that the way people look at art can vary depending on their social background and cultural preferences. Popular aesthetics tends to prioritize the connection between art and everyday life, while the pure aesthetic emphasizes detachment and disinterestedness. Working-class individuals expect art to serve a specific function and base their judgments on ethical considerations, while intellectuals may focus more on the artistic representation itself. The pure aesthetic, influenced by economic factors, involves a particular disposition towards the world that includes a level of distance from necessity.
In this passage, Pierre Bourdieu discusses how the aesthetic disposition, which involves purifying, refining, and sublimating primary needs and impulses, can extend beyond art and permeate various areas of life. The stylization of life, prioritizing forms over function and manner over matter, can have similar effects in different domains. It allows for the aestheticization of everyday objects or choices, even those considered banal or common.
Bourdieu argues that the way individuals relate to realities and fictions, and their beliefs in them with varying degrees of distance and detachment, are closely tied to their positions in social space and their social class dispositions. Taste, in terms of cultural preferences, acts as a classifier and reflects the social distinctions made by individuals. Statistical analysis has shown that similar oppositions found in cultural practices also manifest in eating habits. For example, the opposition between quantity and quality, substance and form, corresponds to the different tastes influenced by proximity to necessity or an emphasis on stylized forms and denial of function.
The study of taste and cultural consumption challenges the idea that legitimate culture exists as a separate realm from ordinary consumption. It seeks to uncover the intelligible relations that unite seemingly unrelated choices in music, food, painting, sport, literature, hairstyle, and more. By reintegrating aesthetic consumption into ordinary consumption, this approach challenges the traditional distinction between sensory pleasure and pure pleasure, as well as the association of pure pleasure with moral excellence and sublimation.
Bourdieu suggests that cultural consecration, which confers legitimacy and symbolic value on objects, people, and situations, elevates them to a higher ontological status akin to transubstantiation. This cultural consecration and the denial of lower, natural enjoyment imply the superiority of those who can appreciate sublimated, refined, disinterested, and distinguished pleasures. Art and cultural consumption, consciously or unconsciously, fulfill a social function by legitimizing social differences.
In simpler terms, Bourdieu argues that the aesthetic disposition can extend beyond art and influence various aspects of life. The way people appreciate and engage with cultural practices reflects their social positions and class dispositions. Taste acts as a classifier, and cultural preferences can be influenced by social class. The study of taste challenges the separation between high culture and ordinary consumption, highlighting the connections between seemingly unrelated choices. Cultural consecration elevates certain objects and experiences, and the denial of lower forms of enjoyment implies the superiority of refined pleasures. Ultimately, art and cultural consumption play a role in legitimizing social inequalities.
#distinctionasocialcritiqueofthejudgementoftaste #pierrebourdieu #popularculture #massculture #puregazeandnaivegaze #englishliterature #culturaltheory #
0 Comments