🔴 About the author
(Picture of the Author has been taken from Wikipedia)
Aijaz Ahmad (1941–2022) was an Indian-born Marxist philosopher, literary theorist, and political commentator. He was known for his critical analysis of postcolonialism, global capitalism, and South Asian politics. Born in Muzaffarnagar, British India, Ahmad was deeply influenced by the political unrest in Pakistan before moving to the United States. He taught at institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, York University, and later at the University of California, Irvine.
Ahmad's work combined Marxist critique with literary theory. His notable books include In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures, which critiques postcolonial theory, and Ghazals of Ghalib, showcasing his love for Urdu poetry. He also contributed to journals like Monthly Review and worked as an editorial consultant for Frontline. Ahmad passed away in 2022 in Irvine, California.
🔴 SUMMARY & STRUCTURE
Aijaz Ahmad's "In the Mirror of Urdu: Recompositions of Nation and Community, 1947-65" is a 35-page essay that examines the transformations in Urdu language and literature following the Partition of India in 1947, up to the Indo-Pak War of 1965. The essay is structured around key historical events and their impact on Urdu literary culture.
1. Introduction: Ahmad introduces his reflections on the evolution of Urdu literature, framed between the events of Partition and the 1965 Indo-Pak War. He emphasizes that while the immediate consequences of Partition were evident by 1957, the full impact of these changes matured by the early 1960s, culminating in a transformed literary landscape post-1965.
2. The Year 1957: This section highlights significant literary milestones, such as the publication of N.M. Rashid's "Iran Mein Ajnabi" (A Stranger in Iran) and the composition of the final ghazal in Faiz Ahmed Faiz's "Zindan Nama" (Prison Chronicle). Ahmad notes the decline of the Progressive Writers' Movement and the rise of the 'Modernity' (Jadeedyat) movement during this period.
3. Shifts in Ideological Tendencies: Ahmad discusses the ideological transitions within Urdu literature, particularly the suppression of leftist intellectuals in Pakistan following events like the Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case and the 1958 coup d'état. He also touches upon the prolonged and ambiguous shifts in India, marked by the founding of the journal "Shab Khoon" after the 1965 war, signaling a similar ideological shift.
4. Passing of Pre-Independence Figures: This section reflects on the deaths of influential personalities such as Maulana Zafar Ali Khan (1956), Maulana Abul Kalam Azad (1958), and Hasrat Mohani (1952), symbolizing the end of an era in Urdu journalism and literature.
5. Saadat Hasan Manto's Demise: Ahmad examines the life and untimely death of writer Saadat Hasan Manto in 1955, attributing his demise to the traumatic experiences of Partition and his subsequent struggles in post-Partition Pakistan. Manto's works, including stories like "Toba Tek Singh" and "Khol Do," are highlighted as poignant commentaries on the human cost of Partition.
6. Impact of the 1965 Indo-Pak War: The essay concludes by analyzing how the 1965 war solidified changes in the literary map, leading to a reorganization of Urdu-speaking literary intelligentsia and the rise of new literary movements and publications in both India and Pakistan.
Throughout the essay, Ahmad delves into the existential challenges faced by Urdu writers and speakers, addressing themes of memory, migration, and the evolving notions of nation and community in the post-Partition era.
🔴 EXPLANATION
◽️Elaborative Explanation of Aijaz Ahmad’s "In the Mirror of Urdu: Recompositions of Nation and Community, 1947-65"
Aijaz Ahmad’s essay "In the Mirror of Urdu: Recompositions of Nation and Community, 1947-65" critically examines the transformations in Urdu language, literature, and its ideological positioning in the subcontinent, particularly in the context of Partition in 1947 and the Indo-Pak War in 1965. Ahmad analyzes the shifts in Urdu literary culture, community identity, and national consciousness, exploring how Urdu intellectuals and writers navigated the political and social upheavals of the time.
1. Introduction: The Framework of Transformation
Ahmad begins by situating Urdu literature within the larger historical and political contexts of the post-Partition era. He argues that the most significant effects of Partition on Urdu were evident by 1957, but the full realization of its impact came by the 1960s, culminating in the period after the Indo-Pak War of 1965.
Key themes include Partition as a turning point in Urdu literature, the shifting ideological and literary trends that followed, and the decline of traditional Urdu literary centers with the emergence of new ones. The essay suggests that Partition was not just a political event but a cultural rupture, where Urdu, once associated with a shared composite culture, became divided between India and Pakistan, leading to significant shifts in its literary and ideological expressions.
2. The Year 1957: A Symbolic Turning Point
Ahmad identifies 1957 as a crucial year for Urdu literature. He highlights two significant literary milestones: the publication of "Iran Mein Ajnabi" (A Stranger in Iran) by Noon Meem Rashid and the composition of the final ghazal in "Zindan Nama" (Prison Chronicle) by Faiz Ahmed Faiz.
These works symbolized a transition in Urdu poetry from the traditional aesthetics of the Progressive Writers’ Movement toward a more modernist expression. Ahmad notes that by 1957, the once-dominant Progressive Writers’ Movement had started to decline, and a new literary sensibility, known as Modernism (Jadeedyat), was emerging.
Key observations include the decline of the Progressive Writers’ Movement, Urdu literature beginning to reflect the new socio-political realities of post-colonial India and Pakistan, and a move toward modernist and existential themes in poetry and fiction.
3. Shifts in Ideological Tendencies: The Impact of Political Suppression
Ahmad discusses the suppression of leftist and progressive intellectuals, particularly in Pakistan, where the state actively cracked down on communist and left-leaning writers. Key events such as the Rawalpindi Conspiracy Case in 1951 and the military coup of 1958 led to the marginalization of leftist literary voices.
In Pakistan, many progressive Urdu writers faced persecution, imprisonment, or exile. Literature shifted towards themes of disillusionment, existentialism, and individual struggle rather than collective revolution. The military regime’s control over intellectual spaces led to a reconfiguration of literary expression.
In India, the decline of progressive movements was less abrupt, but Urdu itself was facing institutional neglect. Hindi was being promoted as the national language, pushing Urdu into a marginalized space. The literary journal "Shab Khoon" (founded after 1965) became a significant platform for modernist Urdu writers, marking an ideological shift from the progressive tradition.
Ahmad highlights how Urdu literature became fragmented between nationalist discourses in India and Pakistan, with ideological battles playing out in literary circles.
4. Passing of Pre-Independence Figures: The End of an Era
This section reflects on the deaths of key Urdu intellectuals, symbolizing the passing of an older generation and the closing of a chapter in Urdu’s literary history. Ahmad particularly notes the deaths of Maulana Zafar Ali Khan in 1956, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad in 1958, and Hasrat Mohani in 1952.
These figures represented an older Urdu literary and journalistic culture deeply tied to the freedom movement and composite nationalism. With their passing, the linguistic and ideological landscape of Urdu saw a marked shift.
Key implications include the loss of figures who had shaped Urdu as a language of resistance and composite culture, a shift from nationalist and anti-colonial themes to more fragmented, nation-specific literary expressions, and Urdu literature moving towards personal, existential, and abstract themes rather than collective revolutionary narratives.
5. The Demise of Saadat Hasan Manto: A Symbol of Partition’s Trauma
Saadat Hasan Manto, one of the most significant Urdu writers of the 20th century, died in 1955, just eight years after Partition. Ahmad presents Manto’s life and death as emblematic of the psychological and cultural trauma caused by Partition.
Manto struggled after migrating to Pakistan, suffering financial difficulties, censorship, and mental distress. His stories such as "Toba Tek Singh" and "Khol Do" exposed the horrors of Partition and the absurdity of communal divisions.
Ahmad argues that Manto’s death symbolized the cost of Partition on Urdu intellectuals—many of whom, like him, struggled to find belonging in the new national contexts. His works continue to serve as reminders of the deep scars left by Partition.
6. The Impact of the 1965 Indo-Pak War: A Cultural and Literary Divide
Ahmad concludes the essay by analyzing the repercussions of the 1965 Indo-Pak War on Urdu literature.
Key consequences include the war deepening the cultural and linguistic divisions between India and Pakistan, Urdu in Pakistan becoming increasingly tied to nationalist discourse with the state promoting it as a symbol of Islamic identity, and Urdu in India being further sidelined, with its association with Pakistan being used as a justification for neglect. The war also influenced Urdu poetry and literature, leading to a rise in nationalistic themes and the decline of a shared literary heritage.
Ahmad suggests that by 1965, Urdu had undergone a complete ideological transformation. What was once a language of cultural synthesis had been divided into two distinct national narratives, with writers in both countries responding to their respective political climates.
7. Conclusion: Urdu’s Fragmented Legacy
Ahmad’s essay presents Urdu literature as a mirror to the historical transformations of the subcontinent. He argues that Urdu, once a language of cultural unity, became fractured due to the ideological and political divides created by Partition and later intensified by the 1965 war.
Final reflections include Urdu literature in India and Pakistan taking separate trajectories post-Partition, the Progressive movement’s decline leading to the rise of new literary trends, particularly modernism, political repression shaping the themes and concerns of Urdu writers in both countries, the loss of figures like Manto, Azad, and Hasrat Mohani marking the end of an older tradition of Urdu literature, and by 1965, Urdu losing much of its pre-Partition identity, becoming more nationalistic in Pakistan and increasingly marginalized in India.
Ahmad’s essay ultimately serves as a critical reflection on how language, literature, and identity are deeply intertwined with history, and how political shifts can lead to the redefinition of cultural and literary traditions.
Visit : 👉👉 Literary Sphere for more
0 Comments